Q: What’s the movie about?
A: A teenage girl moves from her Phoenix home to the small town of Forks in the Pacific Northwest where she meets and falls in love with a vampire. Problems ensue.
Q: Who’s in the movie?
A: Kristen Stewart, Robert Pattinson, Billy Burke, Ashley Greene, Nikki Reed, Michael Welch, Jackson Rathbone, Kellan Lutz, Peter Facinelli, Cam Giganet, Taylor Lautner, Anna Kendrick, Justin Chon, Elizabeth Reaser, Rachelle Lefevre, Edi Gathegi
Q: Is this movie worth the price of admission?
A:
Go! I know what you're thinking, "Isn’t this that cheesy vampire movie based on that cheesy teen girl book? You’re telling me to go? Really?" Yeah, really, especially since the film is better than the book and it’s an all-around entertaining night at the movies whether you’re a teen girl or not (I am not).Q: Will this movie make me laugh?
A: Everyone knows there’s nothing funnier than deadpan vampire-humor. Plus, Robert Pattinson (as Edward) displays uncanny comic timing as he gets off some good lines that are (purposely) funny in their absurdity.
Q: Will this movie make me cry?
A: Probably not. Unless you’re a girl. And 15. And in love with the hottie at school who may or may not be a vampire but nevertheless is very cool.
Q: Will this movie be up for any awards?
A: It'll sweep MTV and the Teen Choice Awards, but do those buy it any credibility?
Q: How is the Acting?
A: Anyone who has read the bestselling book knows it’s all about the teenage protagonists Bella and Edward, and boy do Kristen Stewart and Robert Pattinson deliver on these characters. They are one of the primary reasons the film surpasses the book, as both take material that could have been 100% camp and 100% crap and make it all work beautifully. Pattinson brings out all facets of the angsty and menacing sides of his 80 year-old vampire and Stewart deftly keeps her Bella from becoming a trite and shallow teen girl by conveying intelligence and grace. Their chemistry together works on every level and that is everything for a film like this. If you want to see a great example of two young, gifted actors raising the level of the material they’re in, then Twilight is worth seeing for that reason alone.
Q: How is the Directing?
A: It all works and moves along at a brisk pace and Catherine Hardwicke shows off the beauty of the Pacific Northwest with plenty of stunning panoramic helicopter shots that keep the film grounded in a strong sense of place. She also gets credit for finding just the right overall tone for the film that gives it the gravity it should have, yet retains a sly sense of humor about it. One only wishes she had been given a bigger budget to make some of the effects and Spider-Man like climbing scenes look better and more believable. (Edward’s skin in sunlight = cheesy sparkling effect,) After this film makes a gazillion dollars, I’m sure Hardwicke will have that budget for the sequel.
Q: How is the story/script?
A: Melissa Rosenberg does a great job adapting Stephanie Meyer’s much-beloved book. Having read the novel recently, I can say that she collapses and condenses much of the repetitive dialogue down to its essence which makes for a more tolerable story that plays better to a wider audience. And judging from the 200 or so screaming teen girls that were in the theater when I saw it, she was also able to satisfy their demand for staying true to the plot and characters of the book. Good work Melissa, here’s hoping you’re hired to write the coming sequels! (There are 4 books in the series.)
Back To Top |  |
8 comments:
Um, yeah, so, this > There Will Be Blood in your opinion. Yikes.
I saw 'There Will Be Blood' with Monique and we had major differences on that film. I thought it was the best film of the year (of maybe the past 10 years), but Monique reviewed it, not me. So the comparison in reviews doesn't count in this case.
--Russ
Yes, 2 things.
1) As "Anonymous #2" (who signs his name "Russ") points out, I, Monique, reviewed There Will Be Blood, while Russ (aka "Anonymous #2" above) reviewed Twilight, so it's not the same reviewer you're comparing.
2) My rating system is not always based on my "opinion." I often give good movies a yellow light if I think there is going to be a large contingent of viewer/readers who will have a problem with it, or not be able to find the entertainment value in it. (Religulous, for example was a movie I absolutely loved, but I gave it a yellow, because I knew it would offend certain people of faith.) It so happens, that when it comes to There Will Be Blood, I was right. I talked to a lot of people who didn't like anything except Daniel Day Lewis' performance-- which everyone agrees was great. Many thought the movie was too long, hated the score, and didn't think the story was engrossing enough. Many people were not entertained by that film.
3) And a 3rd thing, too: don't be so chicken-sh*t, Anonymous #1. If you're going to be negative, go ahead and do it with a name, link and website, so we can know who you are.
By the way, thanks for reading! :-)
I dont know. I saw a trailer for the film and it looked very "meh". I dont know what the hype is about.
Farzan, you may not be the audience for this.
It's really a teenage love story more than anything else. What's great about it is that the sexual tension between them is palpable, and that's why young girls are getting so excited about it. But also because they all read the books, (which I haven't), but I'm sure the sexual tension is equally as exciting in the books. For teenage girls, this is one of the most important feelings you can get. And Robert Pattinson is the stuff sex dreams are made of.
And btw, girls aren't nearly as serviced as boys in the movies, (as seen by the weekly superhero movie releases), so it makes sense that when they are given that rare offering they would flock to it like a pack of hungry lionesses to a gazelle.
So you say this film is worth the price of admission? You mean with it's overly cheesy dialogue and over the top acting by almost everyone but Pattinson?
Oh, my name is Colin by the way. I'm not putting a link or a website though. Nothing to do with being "chicken shit". It has to do with there not really being a need for it.
i don't understand what is the appeal of Robert Pattinson (Edward); he has an unusually shaped nose
It's the way he looks at her that makes the girls swoon. He's dreamy... And I have an unusually shaped nose, so I can't hate him for that. People either love it or hate it (my nose, I mean. And the ones that hate it usually keep mum.)
Post a Comment