A: A famous actor (Adam Sandler) is diagnosed with a fatal disease, so he goes back to his stand-up comedy roots and hires an aspiring comedian (Seth Rogen) as a joke writer, but we all know that secretly, he's really hired this assistant to be his only friend.
Q: Who’s in the movie?
A: Adam Sandler, Seth Rogen, Leslie Mann, Eric Bana, Jonah Hill, Jason Schwartzman, Aubrey Plaza, Maude Apatow, Iris Apatow, RZA, Aziz Ansari, Torsten Voges
Q: Is this movie worth the price of admission?
A:
Go! This realistic comedy about a serious subject matter is not as funny or broad as Apatow's usual fare, but it's not meant to be. In fact, if it weren't for all the jokes about male genitalia, this might almost pass for a movie by James L. Brooks.Q: Will this movie make me laugh?
A: A lot more than a movie that some people are calling a "drama" should. And strangely, some of the biggest laughs come from easy listening singer, James Taylor.
Q: Will this movie make me cry?
A: Probably not, but Rogen has a pretty funny crying scene at The Palm restaurant. He ruins The Palm.
Q: Will this movie be up for any awards?
A: If Apatow is truly trying to follow in the footsteps of James L. Brooks-- which I believe he very consciously is-- then Academy Award nominations are definitely in his mind's eye. The only thing standing in his way now is his inner teenager. You know, the one who insists on using every male character to describe all the facets of having a dingaling and every imaginable thing that can be done with it. Audiences like those jokes, but the Academy has a hard time taking them seriously.
Q: How is the Acting?
A: Back for seconds, the Apatow sisters, Maude and Iris, once again steal every scene they're in. Everyone else pretty much repeats their usual shtick-- which is a good thing, since we all seem to like it so much. And there's something about Jason Schwatzman in this one that isn't quite so abrasive. You still won't like his character, but it's not as easy as it looks to hate him.
Q: How is the Directing?
A: In the opening scenes, you can tell that Apatow is trying to step up his game and be seen as more than just a comedy guy. But his existing success has put him in a position where the studios can no longer tell him to keep his movies under 2hrs, which is too bad for him, because at 2 1/2 hours, it would have been a better film if someone had forced him to rein it in.
Q: How is the story/script?
A: The portrayal of the loneliness of being a rich and famous person is touching and relatable, even to those of us who are not famous. But the extended running time comes from having an indulgent story structure, which tells one story, and just as we think the film is going to wrap up, launches into a whole second story, introducing several important new characters, and going in a direction that is interesting, but not necessary. Had these two stories been intertwined, the film would have been both shorter and stronger.
Q: Where can I see the trailer?
A: http://www.moviefone.com/movie/funny-people/33221/trailers
Back To Top |  |
3 comments:
its amusing !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I thought this movie was very good. I gave it a solid B in my review. I thought it was a bold direction for director Judd Apatow. I didn't find it as funny as Knocked Up, but it was still pretty damn funny. I loved Sandler's performance in this film and it just goes to prove those haters out their that the man can act. I did find the runtime to be awfully long especially with parts that could have been trimmed or shortened. I also felt the second half almost felt like a completely separate movie.
I really liked Funny People too. I didn't want to see it because I thought the trailer looked bad but I went to a free screening and laughed my ass off. You are right though, it was too long ... actually at one point, the old man sitting behind me said, THIS MOVIE WILL NEVER END.
Glad you're telling people to GO. I think the length of the film and marketing campaign is the reason it's underperforming at the box office. It really is a good movie.
Post a Comment